|
Trawling the ICW, day 8
We stayed in port today. Frank rented a car to visit family,
and Iputtered around the boat. Our layover was well timed
with the weather. The wind was blowing with enthusiasm from
the south, just the direction we would be going. I enjoyed a day
of goofing off more than usual, and I assume that Frank
enjoyed a day with no navigational decisions to make
concerning buoy locations, bridge heights, or water depth.
Bridges on the ICW are interesting in that you never quite
know ahead of time how high they will be, and whether or not
your boat will fit under them without the need to ask the
bridge tender for a lift. At first glance, you would think
that you could just check your chart and read off the bridge
height. You can indeed do just that, but the published
bridge height is not the whole story. There are 2 more
things to consider. One is that the tides are constantly
changing the distance from the water's surface to the
underside of the bridge. The other variable is the shape of
the bridge. Some bridge spans are higher in the middle. The
bottom line is that you never really know the bridge height
until you call the bridge tender on the vhf, and even THEN
they might not tell you (though they usually do). Bridge
openings are another issue. Some bridges open only at
certain times. Some open only on request. And a few open
only on request at certain times. Bridges on the ICW
are great fun. Did I mention that different bridges use
different vhf frequencies?
As an overview, the ICW I had traveled so far typically had
a reasonably wide channel around 12 feet deep (notice that I
used the word "typically" and not "always"). There was
"typically" plenty of room for 3 yachts to all pass each
other at the same time. The area that I traveled between
Charleston and Palm Beach was usually rural, and often
swampy. There are some very nice and very large houses along
the waterway, but these houses are generally scattered along
the shoreline. I later noticed 2 changes in the overall
character of the ICW, both of them south of the Georgia
Florida border. The first change was that the number of
large, modern, waterfront houses seemed to significantly
increase in Florida. There was still plenty of streaches of
undeveloped swamp in Florida, but there was a definate
increase in the density of housing. The other big change I
noticed in the ICW was much clearer water by the time we
were nearing the Palm Beach area.
Although most of the ICW is a reasonably wide channel
through swamp land, there are areas of open water. The ICW
makes use of several bays and sounds as it makes it's way
south along the coast. Often, these sounds are very shallow;
3 feet or less. Such a vast area of shallow water is a sure
fire recipie for rough water when the wind picks up. It is
not unusual for pleasure boats to remain in port on a windy
day when they need to cross one of these large sounds. We
traveled for at least 2 days on something called the Indian
River, which was really not a river at all, but rather a
wide area of water between barrier islands on the Atlantic
sea shore to the east, and the mainland to the west. I think
half of it was shallow enough to wade across.
click on the day you want to see...
|